CORS Research Standard Operating Procedures
Department of Colorectal Surgery — Cleveland Clinic Foundation — Updated 10/21/2025
1. Expectations & Policies
- Work (research) 40–50 hours per week (CCF policy)
- At least 5 manuscripts per year (Gen Surg and CORS Policy)
- Lots of abstracts and few manuscripts is a red flag during fellowship applications
- Policy: PI must have a near-ready manuscript prior to travel; no manuscript = no travel
Office Attendance & Remote Work
- Minimum 3 days per week in office — required for all fellows regardless of visa status (J1 visa compliance verified with GME)
- Maximum 2 days per week from home
- Remote access must be from a Cleveland-based location (cybersecurity compliance)
- Desk outside Dr. Holubar's office: search
A30-262A Hotel Deskto reserve. Additional shared desk in the clinical fellows' room (next to Elissa, 2nd on the left)
Moonlighting (Gen Surg PGYs Only)
- Mandatory reporting of all moonlighting to Gen Surg PD
- One 12-hr call at Hillcrest per month required
- FV SICU at the discretion of the PI and trainee
- Don't let moonlighting interfere with research — it is a privilege, not a right
Monthly Reports
A monthly report will be requested to help support the numerous projects each fellow is working on. This helps identify areas needing improvement with feedback and input from PIs and the research team.
2. Research Analytic Staff
| Name | Role | Contact |
|---|---|---|
| Tony Lembo, MD | DDI Vice-Chair for Research | |
| Rita Brienza | CORS Research Program Manager | |
| Mark Mettler | DDI Research Admin Director | |
| Sam Bolozdynya | CORS Research RN Coordinator | |
| Monica Branche | CORS Research RN Coordinator | |
| Jade Johnson | CORS Research Coordinator II | |
| Cory McMahan | DDI Research Admin | |
| James Unick | DDI Research Clinical Projects Mgr. III (agreements & contracts) | |
| Jie Dai, PhD | CORS Manager Informatics, Registries & Reporting | daij@ccf.org |
| Jennifer Sanchez, MS | CORS Biostatistician | sancheh2@ccf.org |
| Li Tang, PhD | Lead Biostatistician | |
| Renee Wu, MS | Biostatistical Programmer | wur3@ccf.org |
| John McMichael | Associate Chief Medical Information Officer | mcmichj2@ccf.org |
3. Biostats Support
The default should be Jennifer Sanchez and Dr. Li Tang for biostatistical support. See the Biostatistics Reference for methods guidance.
4. Data Resources
Local Databases
| Database | N |
|---|---|
| CORS Registry | 64,839 |
| IPAA | 5,858 |
| Redo IPAA | 517 |
| Crohn's | 10,181 |
| Rectal Cancer | 5,501 |
| Colon Cancer | 4,501 |
| Diverticulitis | 6,110 |
| DDSI QC CORS | 2,721 |
| Colectomy | 1,849 |
| Proctectomy | 402 |
| Pouch | 255 |
| Prolapse | 123 |
| Small bowel | 91 |
Curated National Data
| Dataset | N | Years |
|---|---|---|
| NSQIP PUF (small bowel, colon, rectum) | 1,622,596 | 2005–2021* |
| NSQIP Colectomy | 342,570 | 2012–2021* |
| NSQIP Proctectomy | 26,823 | 2016–2021* |
| NSQIP IBD Collaborative | 12,206 | 2018–2022 |
| National Inpatient Sample | 970,973 | 2005–2020 |
| CORS NSQIP (total) | 9,021 | 2005–5/31/2023** |
| — Colectomy | 6,635 | |
| — Proctectomy | 2,566 | |
| — UC | 1,487 | |
| — Crohn's | 1,340 | |
| — Colon cancer | 830 | |
| — Rectal cancer | 764 | |
| — Diverticular disease | 419 |
* Annually updated Oct. ** Runs 3 months behind
Patient-Reported Outcomes — Pouch QoL & Bowel Function
| Domain | Questionnaire | Period | Years | Encounters | Patients | Continue? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pouch Surveys | CCF Pouch Survey | 1983–2018 | 35 | 27,529 | 4,232 | |
| Pouch Surveys | Pouch Follow-up Survey | 1983–2023 | 40 | 29,140 | 4,481 | YES |
| Overall QoL | Cleveland Global QoL | 1983–2019 | 36 | 33,817 | 5,167 | |
| Overall QoL | Surgery Satisfaction | 2009–2017 | 8 | 1,473 | 976 | No |
| Overall QoL | SF12 | 2009–2017 | 8 | 6,411 | 2,349 | No |
| Overall QoL | Pain VAS | 2009–2019 | 10 | 4,218 | 1,795 | No |
| Overall QoL | EuroQoL 5D | 2009–2015 | 6 | 7,177 | 2,346 | No |
| Disease-specific | Cancer | 1993–2017 | 24 | 2,281 | 1,214 | YES? |
| Disease-specific | Crohn's | 2009–2018 | 9 | 5,850 | 2,832 | No |
| Disease-specific | IBDQOL | 2009–2012 | 3 | 314 | 279 | No |
| Disease-specific | SIBDQ (IBDQ short form) | 2001–2019 | 18 | 16,352 | 3,989 | No |
| GI Function | Bristol Stools | 1983–2018 | 35 | 27,958 | 4,616 | YES |
| GI Function | CSI (constipation severity) | 2009–2018 | 9 | 2,908 | 1,952 | No |
| GI Function | FIQL (fecal incont QoL) | 2001–2018 | 17 | 13,244 | 3,568 | YES |
| GI Function | FISI (fecal incont severity) | 1983–2018 | 35 | 31,499 | 4,566 | YES |
| GI Function | Stoma QoL | 2009–2017 | 8 | 2,131 | 1,265 | No |
| Sexual Function | FSFIS (female sexual func) | 2009–2015 | 6 | 822 | 533 | Yes |
| Sexual Function | IIEF (erectile func) | 2004–2015 | 11 | 1,026 | 689 | Yes |
Patient-Reported Outcomes — Non-Pouch QoL & Bowel Function
| Domain | Questionnaire | Period | Years | Encounters | Patients | Continue? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall QoL | Cleveland Global QoL | 2000–2017 | 17 | 34,593 | 12,187 | Yes |
| Overall QoL | Surgery Satisfaction | 2009–2017 | 8 | 4,351 | 3,289 | Yes |
| Overall QoL | SF12 | 2009–2017 | 12 | 18,206 | 7,555 | Maybe vs. PROMIS |
| Overall QoL | Pain VAS | 2009–2019 | 10 | 11,811 | 5,787 | Yes vs. PROMIS |
| Overall QoL | EuroQoL 5D | 2009–2015 | 6 | 21,351 | 7,943 | Maybe vs. PROMIS |
| Disease-specific | Cancer | 1985–2017 | 32 | 10,962 | 5,253 | Maybe vs. EORTC |
| Disease-specific | Crohn's | 2009–2017 | 18 | 14,481 | 8,183 | Yes vs. CUCQ |
| Disease-specific | IBDQOL | 2009–2012 | 4 | 1,060 | 814 | No |
| Disease-specific | SIBDQ (IBDQ short form) | 2002–2019 | 7 | 12,797 | 4,102 | No |
| GI Function | Bristol Stools | 1996–2018 | 22 | 17,377 | 9,095 | Yes |
| GI Function | CSI (constipation severity) | 2009–2017 | 18 | 7,509 | 5,076 | Yes |
| GI Function | FIQL (fecal incont QoL) | 2000–2017 | 17 | 9,869 | 6,215 | Yes |
| GI Function | FISI (fecal incont severity) | 2009–2017 | 18 | 12,922 | 7,678 | Yes |
| GI Function | Stoma QoL | 2009–2017 | 8 | 4,541 | 2,754 | Yes vs. new instrument |
| Sexual Function | FSFIS (female sexual func) | 2009–2015 | 6 | 1,619 | 1,255 | Yes |
| Sexual Function | IIEF (erectile func) | 2007–2015 | 8 | 1,572 | 1,251 | Yes |
5. How to Request Data
How to Request Data from the CORS Registry
- Make a list of ICD-9 & ICD-10 (diagnosis) codes
- Make a list of CPT (surgery) codes
- Limit to a period of time (e.g., 2010–2020)
- Consider how much additional chart review is needed
- Consider how much follow-up time is needed (e.g., 5 years for oncologic outcomes)
- Ask Jie Dai to query the CORS Registry to get case counts
- May be done preparatory to research if you do not yet have IRB approval
- After IRB approval, Jie will send data via JTool
6. How to Conduct a CORS Study
Step 1: Prepare — Research Your Topic in PubMed
Prepare a succinct 1-page summary which can be parsed into the background for the abstract and introduction of the manuscript:
- 1st paragraph — Define the disease/procedure and scope of problem/burden
- 2nd paragraph — What have we learned from the literature so far
- 3rd paragraph — How will we address the problem or knowledge gap; end with your scientific aim and hypothesis
Step 2: IRB Application
Write a 1-page protocol (hence the background literature review). What they really want is the list of exact variables you plan on collecting — in Word format, not Excel.
New IRB Study Flowchart
- Before IRB: CORS REDCap Feasibility Form (mandatory), pitch idea at Research Meeting
- Submit to IRB only after approval of Feasibility Form
- After IRB Approval: JTool request to Jie Dai; request analytic support no later than 6 weeks before abstract deadline
- Ongoing: Use study-specific REDCap for data capture (not Excel); re-present at Research Meeting before submitting abstract or presenting
- Off-boarding: Close IRB/REDCaps or assign to someone staying; request DUA/CDA if needed
IRB: Studies Collecting New Variables
Aim: Reduce administrative burden of submitting new IRB applications for every retrospective chart review.
Solution: Construct disease-specific IRB-approved "Registries" and submit Appendix Amendments instead of new applications from scratch.
| Registry | PI | IRB # |
|---|---|---|
| CORS Registry (Umbrella IRB) | Holubar | 08-670 |
| Pouch Registry | Holubar | 22-1152 |
| Neoplasia Registry | Liska | 22-821 |
| Crohn's Registry | Holubar | — |
| EMR Registry | Gorgun | — |
| Pelvic Floor Registry | Spivak | — |
| Benign Colorectal Registry | Kessler | — |
7. Processes & Forms
DDSI/CORS Research Policies & Forms
| Form | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 1. CORS Research Feasibility Form (REDCap) | Mandatory prior to any IRB submission, including new retrospective chart reviews. Do not submit any new IRB without express approval. Intent: improve research quality and head off returned/rejected IRB applications. |
| 2. Registry Data Request Form | Required IRB form if you plan on submitting a study using existing data from an established Registry (CORS, Crohn's, Neoplasia, etc.) |
| 3. QDR Data Request Form | Required for any NSQIP project, even if you already have the data. These forms are needed to justify the cost of NSQIP (>$100,000 annually). Send to Nancy Anzclovar. |
| 4. Data Use Agreement (DUA) & Confidentiality Agreement (CDA) | Required of any trainee who has left CCF but is still working on research projects. CDA takes 24–48 hrs. DUA (for REDCap access) is a longer process. |
8. Meetings & Travel
Surgical Conferences
| Conference | Abstract Due | Conference | Affiliate Journal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Surgical Association | January | June | Surgery |
| Midwest Surgical Association | February | August | American Journal of Surgery |
| ACS Clinical Congress | March | October | JACS |
| Cleveland Surgical Society | April | May | — |
| Society of Black Academic Surgeons | April | September | American Journal of Surgery |
| United European Gastro Week (UEG) | April | October | |
| Academic Surgical Congress (ASC) | June | February | |
| Asian Pacific Digestive Week (APDW) | August | December | |
| Advances in IBD (AIBD) | September | December | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) | October | March | Annals of Surgical Oncology |
| ASCRS | October | June | Diseases of Colon & Rectum |
| Crohn's & Colitis Congress (CCC) | October | January | |
| SAGES | October | March | Surgical Endoscopy |
| DDW / SSAT | November | May | Gastroenterology / Surgery |
| ECCO | November | February | J Crohn's & Colitis |
10. Altmetrics
Altmetrics are non-traditional bibliometrics proposed as an alternative or complement to traditional citation impact metrics (impact factor, h-index). They measure scholarly impact based on diverse online research output including social media, news media, and reference managers.
- Demonstrates both the impact and the detailed composition of impact
- Can be applied to: articles, people, journals, books, datasets, presentations, videos, code repositories
- Useful for: research filtering, promotion & tenure dossiers, grant applications, ranking newly-published articles
Learn more: Wikipedia — Altmetrics
11. Scientific Posters
- Always use a CCF Poster Template available pre-formatted to 4×6 from the Intranet under OnBrand
- Remember the audience will look at posters for seconds to minutes — briefly and concisely get your point across visually
- Avoid busy/crowded layouts with too many tables and figures
Poster Printing
| Format | Cost |
|---|---|
| 4×6 fabric poster | $60 |
| 4×6 paper poster | $14 |
| 4×4 paper poster | $10 |
Use the Lawson cost center for poster expenses.
12. Tables & Figures
CONSORT Diagrams
Every study should include a CONSORT-style flow diagram showing patient selection, exclusions, and final analytic cohort.
Figure Types
- Kaplan-Meier curves — survival analysis with number-at-risk tables
- Forest plots — subgroup analyses and meta-analyses
- Sankey diagrams — patient flow between treatment groups
- Waterfall plots — individual patient responses
Formatting Guidelines
- Figures should be high-resolution (600 DPI for TIFF)
- Use Arial font throughout figures
- Include clear axis labels, legends, and annotations
- Avoid 3D effects and unnecessary gridlines
13. Journals
Primary Target Journals
| Journal | Focus |
|---|---|
| Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) | Official journal of ASCRS — primary target for colorectal surgery |
| Annals of Surgery | Top general surgery journal |
| British Journal of Surgery | International surgical journal |
| JAMA Surgery | High-impact surgical journal |
| Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | IBD-focused, official journal of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation |
| Journal of Crohn's and Colitis | Official journal of ECCO |
| Colorectal Disease | International colorectal journal |
| Surgical Endoscopy | Minimally invasive surgery |
| Annals of Surgical Oncology | Surgical oncology — SSO affiliate |
Abstract Submission Policy
14. Case Reports
- Case reports document rare conditions, unusual presentations, or novel treatments
- Follow the CARE guidelines for case report writing
- Target journals with dedicated case report sections
- Can lead to systematic reviews that aggregate similar cases
15. QI / IND / IDE
Quality Assessment & Quality Improvement Activities
QI/QA projects may not require full IRB review but still require proper documentation and oversight. Key distinctions:
| Category | Description | IRB Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Improvement (QI) | Systematic efforts to improve healthcare delivery processes and outcomes | Usually exempt — but check with IRB |
| Quality Assessment (QA) | Measuring current performance against established standards | Usually exempt |
| Research | Systematic investigation designed to develop generalizable knowledge | Yes — full IRB review |
16. Writing
Formatting & Reporting Numbers
- Follow journal-specific author guidelines for formatting
- Use AMA Manual of Style as default for medical manuscripts
- Report numbers consistently: spell out numbers below 10, use numerals for 10 and above
- Always include units for measurements and lab values
- Use en-dashes for ranges (e.g., 95% CI 0.51–0.76), not hyphens
CCF Writing Resources
The CCF Library offers writing support: CCF Writing Guide
AI Editing Tools
- Paperpal — AI editing tool with a generative AI writing feature (Co-pilot) which can be used for grants, not for publication
- AJE Curie — Professional language editing service
17. Reference Managers
| Tool | Notes |
|---|---|
| EndNote | Institutional standard. Free via CCF Library: CCF EndNote Guide |
| Zotero | Free, open-source alternative |
| Mendeley | Free, owned by Elsevier |
Do not manually type references — this introduces errors and wastes time. Use your reference manager to insert citations and auto-generate the bibliography.
18. Resources
| Resource | Link / Description |
|---|---|
| CCF Library Portal | PubMed & database access |
| CCF Writing Guide | Writing resources & tutorials |
| CCF EndNote Guide | Setup & training |
| OnBrand | CCF poster templates, logo assets, brand guidelines (Intranet) |
| REDCap | Electronic data capture — use for all study data (not Excel) |
| JTool | Data delivery from Jie Dai after IRB approval |
| Big Database Guide | NCBI user guide to various big databases |
| ICMJE Guidelines | Authorship & reporting standards |
| CONSORT Statement | RCT reporting checklist |
| STROBE Statement | Observational study reporting |
| Biostatistics Reference | CORS Fellowship Biostatistics Guide |
| Claude Desktop Guide | Guide to Claude Desktop for Research |
19. Lessons Learned — Real Examples
Common pitfalls in study design & execution
- Starting data collection before IRB approval — even "preparatory" chart review has limits; know the difference
- Not using REDCap — Excel spreadsheets with PHI are an IRB and HIPAA violation waiting to happen
- Not updating REDCap Tracking Tool — if the department doesn't know the study exists, it can't help when problems arise
- Submitting abstracts without PI review — abstracts are published and represent the department
- Late abstracts — submit at least 1 week before deadline for staff review
- Not closing IRBs and REDCaps when leaving — creates compliance orphans
- Padding CVs with minimal contributions — this is easily detected and hurts your credibility
- Not keeping a copy before AI editing — journals can detect AI-edited text and may request the original
Common pitfalls in manuscript writing
- Manually typing references — use a reference manager (see Section 17)
- Inconsistent formatting — follow the target journal's author instructions exactly
- Overcommitting — too many projects = late data, late abstracts, late manuscripts
- Not knowing the CCF literature — if Cleveland Clinic has published on your topic, you must cite it and explain how your work adds to it
- Submitting to the wrong journal — discuss target journal with your PI early