Holubar Lab — Colorectal Surgery Research

CORS Research Standard Operating Procedures

Department of Colorectal Surgery — Cleveland Clinic Foundation — Updated 10/21/2025

1. Expectations & Policies

Core expectations for all research fellows:
  • Work (research) 40–50 hours per week (CCF policy)
  • At least 5 manuscripts per year (Gen Surg and CORS Policy)
  • Lots of abstracts and few manuscripts is a red flag during fellowship applications
  • Policy: PI must have a near-ready manuscript prior to travel; no manuscript = no travel

Office Attendance & Remote Work

  • Minimum 3 days per week in office — required for all fellows regardless of visa status (J1 visa compliance verified with GME)
  • Maximum 2 days per week from home
  • Remote access must be from a Cleveland-based location (cybersecurity compliance)
  • Desk outside Dr. Holubar's office: search A30-262A Hotel Desk to reserve. Additional shared desk in the clinical fellows' room (next to Elissa, 2nd on the left)
Why in-person? Being in the office fosters collaboration and learning that are hard to replicate remotely. These moments help build lasting friendships and professional support networks.

Moonlighting (Gen Surg PGYs Only)

  • Mandatory reporting of all moonlighting to Gen Surg PD
  • One 12-hr call at Hillcrest per month required
  • FV SICU at the discretion of the PI and trainee
  • Don't let moonlighting interfere with research — it is a privilege, not a right

Monthly Reports

A monthly report will be requested to help support the numerous projects each fellow is working on. This helps identify areas needing improvement with feedback and input from PIs and the research team.

2. Research Analytic Staff

NameRoleContact
Tony Lembo, MDDDI Vice-Chair for Research
Rita BrienzaCORS Research Program Manager
Mark MettlerDDI Research Admin Director
Sam BolozdynyaCORS Research RN Coordinator
Monica BrancheCORS Research RN Coordinator
Jade JohnsonCORS Research Coordinator II
Cory McMahanDDI Research Admin
James UnickDDI Research Clinical Projects Mgr. III (agreements & contracts)
Jie Dai, PhDCORS Manager Informatics, Registries & Reportingdaij@ccf.org
Jennifer Sanchez, MSCORS Biostatisticiansancheh2@ccf.org
Li Tang, PhDLead Biostatistician
Renee Wu, MSBiostatistical Programmerwur3@ccf.org
John McMichaelAssociate Chief Medical Information Officermcmichj2@ccf.org
[Image: Department organizational chart — Clinical Research Team Members]

3. Biostats Support

Important: Some fellows have been seeking biostatistical help from each other, but we have a full-time paid biostatistician and PhD. Please work with our Biostatistician Team as a valuable resource — we need to keep them busy or risk losing support!

The default should be Jennifer Sanchez and Dr. Li Tang for biostatistical support. See the Biostatistics Reference for methods guidance.

4. Data Resources

Local Databases

DatabaseN
CORS Registry64,839
IPAA5,858
Redo IPAA517
Crohn's10,181
Rectal Cancer5,501
Colon Cancer4,501
Diverticulitis6,110
DDSI QC CORS2,721
Colectomy1,849
Proctectomy402
Pouch255
Prolapse123
Small bowel91

Curated National Data

DatasetNYears
NSQIP PUF (small bowel, colon, rectum)1,622,5962005–2021*
NSQIP Colectomy342,5702012–2021*
NSQIP Proctectomy26,8232016–2021*
NSQIP IBD Collaborative12,2062018–2022
National Inpatient Sample970,9732005–2020
CORS NSQIP (total)9,0212005–5/31/2023**
— Colectomy6,635
— Proctectomy2,566
— UC1,487
— Crohn's1,340
— Colon cancer830
— Rectal cancer764
— Diverticular disease419

* Annually updated Oct.   ** Runs 3 months behind

Patient-Reported Outcomes — Pouch QoL & Bowel Function

DomainQuestionnairePeriodYearsEncountersPatientsContinue?
Pouch SurveysCCF Pouch Survey1983–20183527,5294,232
Pouch SurveysPouch Follow-up Survey1983–20234029,1404,481YES
Overall QoLCleveland Global QoL1983–20193633,8175,167
Overall QoLSurgery Satisfaction2009–201781,473976No
Overall QoLSF122009–201786,4112,349No
Overall QoLPain VAS2009–2019104,2181,795No
Overall QoLEuroQoL 5D2009–201567,1772,346No
Disease-specificCancer1993–2017242,2811,214YES?
Disease-specificCrohn's2009–201895,8502,832No
Disease-specificIBDQOL2009–20123314279No
Disease-specificSIBDQ (IBDQ short form)2001–20191816,3523,989No
GI FunctionBristol Stools1983–20183527,9584,616YES
GI FunctionCSI (constipation severity)2009–201892,9081,952No
GI FunctionFIQL (fecal incont QoL)2001–20181713,2443,568YES
GI FunctionFISI (fecal incont severity)1983–20183531,4994,566YES
GI FunctionStoma QoL2009–201782,1311,265No
Sexual FunctionFSFIS (female sexual func)2009–20156822533Yes
Sexual FunctionIIEF (erectile func)2004–2015111,026689Yes

Patient-Reported Outcomes — Non-Pouch QoL & Bowel Function

DomainQuestionnairePeriodYearsEncountersPatientsContinue?
Overall QoLCleveland Global QoL2000–20171734,59312,187Yes
Overall QoLSurgery Satisfaction2009–201784,3513,289Yes
Overall QoLSF122009–20171218,2067,555Maybe vs. PROMIS
Overall QoLPain VAS2009–20191011,8115,787Yes vs. PROMIS
Overall QoLEuroQoL 5D2009–2015621,3517,943Maybe vs. PROMIS
Disease-specificCancer1985–20173210,9625,253Maybe vs. EORTC
Disease-specificCrohn's2009–20171814,4818,183Yes vs. CUCQ
Disease-specificIBDQOL2009–201241,060814No
Disease-specificSIBDQ (IBDQ short form)2002–2019712,7974,102No
GI FunctionBristol Stools1996–20182217,3779,095Yes
GI FunctionCSI (constipation severity)2009–2017187,5095,076Yes
GI FunctionFIQL (fecal incont QoL)2000–2017179,8696,215Yes
GI FunctionFISI (fecal incont severity)2009–20171812,9227,678Yes
GI FunctionStoma QoL2009–201784,5412,754Yes vs. new instrument
Sexual FunctionFSFIS (female sexual func)2009–201561,6191,255Yes
Sexual FunctionIIEF (erectile func)2007–201581,5721,251Yes
Big Database User Guide: See the NCBI guide to various big databases and this overview article for additional context on national surgical data sources.

5. How to Request Data

How to Request Data from the CORS Registry

  1. Make a list of ICD-9 & ICD-10 (diagnosis) codes
  2. Make a list of CPT (surgery) codes
  3. Limit to a period of time (e.g., 2010–2020)
  4. Consider how much additional chart review is needed
  5. Consider how much follow-up time is needed (e.g., 5 years for oncologic outcomes)
  6. Ask Jie Dai to query the CORS Registry to get case counts
  7. May be done preparatory to research if you do not yet have IRB approval
  8. After IRB approval, Jie will send data via JTool

6. How to Conduct a CORS Study

Step 1: Prepare — Research Your Topic in PubMed

Prepare a succinct 1-page summary which can be parsed into the background for the abstract and introduction of the manuscript:

  • 1st paragraph — Define the disease/procedure and scope of problem/burden
  • 2nd paragraph — What have we learned from the literature so far
  • 3rd paragraph — How will we address the problem or knowledge gap; end with your scientific aim and hypothesis
Know the CCF literature inside out. Use the CCF Library Portal for PubMed access.

Step 2: IRB Application

Write a 1-page protocol (hence the background literature review). What they really want is the list of exact variables you plan on collecting — in Word format, not Excel.

New IRB Study Flowchart

[Image: IRB Study Flowchart — showing process from CORS REDCap Feasibility Form through IRB submission, approval, JTool data request, and off-boarding]
Key steps in the flowchart:
  • Before IRB: CORS REDCap Feasibility Form (mandatory), pitch idea at Research Meeting
  • Submit to IRB only after approval of Feasibility Form
  • After IRB Approval: JTool request to Jie Dai; request analytic support no later than 6 weeks before abstract deadline
  • Ongoing: Use study-specific REDCap for data capture (not Excel); re-present at Research Meeting before submitting abstract or presenting
  • Off-boarding: Close IRB/REDCaps or assign to someone staying; request DUA/CDA if needed

IRB: Studies Collecting New Variables

Aim: Reduce administrative burden of submitting new IRB applications for every retrospective chart review.

Solution: Construct disease-specific IRB-approved "Registries" and submit Appendix Amendments instead of new applications from scratch.

RegistryPIIRB #
CORS Registry (Umbrella IRB)Holubar08-670
Pouch RegistryHolubar22-1152
Neoplasia RegistryLiska22-821
Crohn's RegistryHolubar
EMR RegistryGorgun
Pelvic Floor RegistrySpivak
Benign Colorectal RegistryKessler
[Image: CCF Colorectal Research Data Structural Relationship to IRB Protocols diagram (10/2023)]

7. Processes & Forms

DDSI/CORS Research Policies & Forms

FormPurpose
1. CORS Research Feasibility Form (REDCap)Mandatory prior to any IRB submission, including new retrospective chart reviews. Do not submit any new IRB without express approval. Intent: improve research quality and head off returned/rejected IRB applications.
2. Registry Data Request FormRequired IRB form if you plan on submitting a study using existing data from an established Registry (CORS, Crohn's, Neoplasia, etc.)
3. QDR Data Request FormRequired for any NSQIP project, even if you already have the data. These forms are needed to justify the cost of NSQIP (>$100,000 annually). Send to Nancy Anzclovar.
4. Data Use Agreement (DUA) & Confidentiality Agreement (CDA)Required of any trainee who has left CCF but is still working on research projects. CDA takes 24–48 hrs. DUA (for REDCap access) is a longer process.
Important: If fellows are still using any CCF-derived data at all — including aggregated data, tables, or charts created here — a confidentiality agreement is required.
[Image: CORS Research Feasibility Form (REDCap screenshot)]
[Image: QDR NSQIP Data Request Form]
[Image: REDCap Attestation — Requesting Data Preparatory to Research]
[Image: Registry Data Request Form — for studies using CORS Registry data]

8. Meetings & Travel

Policy: Do not submit an abstract if YOU do not plan on attending the meeting. You must have an alternative presenter who must be a co-author.

Surgical Conferences

⚠️ DATE CHECK: The abstract deadlines and conference dates below reflect the original SOP and may need updating for the current academic year.
ConferenceAbstract DueConferenceAffiliate Journal
Central Surgical AssociationJanuaryJuneSurgery
Midwest Surgical AssociationFebruaryAugustAmerican Journal of Surgery
ACS Clinical CongressMarchOctoberJACS
Cleveland Surgical SocietyAprilMay
Society of Black Academic SurgeonsAprilSeptemberAmerican Journal of Surgery
United European Gastro Week (UEG)AprilOctober
Academic Surgical Congress (ASC)JuneFebruary
Asian Pacific Digestive Week (APDW)AugustDecember
Advances in IBD (AIBD)SeptemberDecemberInflammatory Bowel Diseases
Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO)OctoberMarchAnnals of Surgical Oncology
ASCRSOctoberJuneDiseases of Colon & Rectum
Crohn's & Colitis Congress (CCC)OctoberJanuary
SAGESOctoberMarchSurgical Endoscopy
DDW / SSATNovemberMayGastroenterology / Surgery
ECCONovemberFebruaryJ Crohn's & Colitis

9. Authorship

CORS Policy: Maximum 2 fellows per study. We strongly discourage "padding" CVs with extra projects where you didn't truly contribute. Seek permission from your PI before adding any additional collaborators, and keep a written record of each fellow's role. Courtesy authorship for research fellows is not appropriate.

ICMJE Criteria

The ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on all 4 of the following criteria:

  1. Substantial contributions to conception or design of the work; or acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data
  2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content
  3. Final approval of the version to be published
  4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring questions about accuracy or integrity are appropriately investigated and resolved

Contributors who meet fewer than all 4 criteria should be acknowledged, not listed as authors.

AI Use & Authorship (ICMJE Policy)

AI-assisted technologies (LLMs, chatbots, image creators) should not be listed as authors because they cannot be responsible for the accuracy, integrity, and originality of the work. Humans are responsible for any submitted material that includes AI-assisted content. Authors must:
  • Disclose AI use in both the cover letter and the submitted work
  • Carefully review and edit AI output for errors, incompleteness, or bias
  • Ensure there is no plagiarism, including in text and images produced by AI
  • Provide appropriate attribution of all quoted material with full citations

10. Altmetrics

Altmetrics are non-traditional bibliometrics proposed as an alternative or complement to traditional citation impact metrics (impact factor, h-index). They measure scholarly impact based on diverse online research output including social media, news media, and reference managers.

  • Demonstrates both the impact and the detailed composition of impact
  • Can be applied to: articles, people, journals, books, datasets, presentations, videos, code repositories
  • Useful for: research filtering, promotion & tenure dossiers, grant applications, ranking newly-published articles
[Image: Altmetric donut badge examples and explanation of score components]

Learn more: Wikipedia — Altmetrics

11. Scientific Posters

Posters are public displays and must be highly polished to represent our department.
  • Always use a CCF Poster Template available pre-formatted to 4×6 from the Intranet under OnBrand
  • Remember the audience will look at posters for seconds to minutes — briefly and concisely get your point across visually
  • Avoid busy/crowded layouts with too many tables and figures

Poster Printing

FormatCost
4×6 fabric poster$60
4×6 paper poster$14
4×4 paper poster$10

Use the Lawson cost center for poster expenses.

[Image: Example CCF-branded scientific poster templates]

12. Tables & Figures

CONSORT Diagrams

Every study should include a CONSORT-style flow diagram showing patient selection, exclusions, and final analytic cohort.

[Image: CONSORT diagram examples — standard format and CCF examples]

Figure Types

  • Kaplan-Meier curves — survival analysis with number-at-risk tables
  • Forest plots — subgroup analyses and meta-analyses
  • Sankey diagrams — patient flow between treatment groups
  • Waterfall plots — individual patient responses
[Image: Example figure types — KM curve, forest plot, Sankey diagram, waterfall plot]

Formatting Guidelines

  • Figures should be high-resolution (600 DPI for TIFF)
  • Use Arial font throughout figures
  • Include clear axis labels, legends, and annotations
  • Avoid 3D effects and unnecessary gridlines
[Image: Video tutorials — how to make dynamic figures, animated visualizations]

13. Journals

Primary Target Journals

JournalFocus
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR)Official journal of ASCRS — primary target for colorectal surgery
Annals of SurgeryTop general surgery journal
British Journal of SurgeryInternational surgical journal
JAMA SurgeryHigh-impact surgical journal
Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesIBD-focused, official journal of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation
Journal of Crohn's and ColitisOfficial journal of ECCO
Colorectal DiseaseInternational colorectal journal
Surgical EndoscopyMinimally invasive surgery
Annals of Surgical OncologySurgical oncology — SSO affiliate
[Image: Art-Photo and Design guidelines — journal cover art, on-brand visual standards]

Abstract Submission Policy

Abstracts are published in journals and must be highly polished to represent our department. Late abstracts will not be allowed. Please have them ready a minimum of 1 week before the meeting deadline to allow thorough review by staff coauthors.

14. Case Reports

Case reports are highly publishable! They can serve as the foundation for subsequent systematic reviews. A single well-written case report can generate significant citations.
  • Case reports document rare conditions, unusual presentations, or novel treatments
  • Follow the CARE guidelines for case report writing
  • Target journals with dedicated case report sections
  • Can lead to systematic reviews that aggregate similar cases
[Image: Example of case report leading to systematic review — citation chain]

15. QI / IND / IDE

Quality Assessment & Quality Improvement Activities

QI/QA projects may not require full IRB review but still require proper documentation and oversight. Key distinctions:

CategoryDescriptionIRB Required?
Quality Improvement (QI)Systematic efforts to improve healthcare delivery processes and outcomesUsually exempt — but check with IRB
Quality Assessment (QA)Measuring current performance against established standardsUsually exempt
ResearchSystematic investigation designed to develop generalizable knowledgeYes — full IRB review
IND (Investigational New Drug) / IDE (Investigational Device Exemption): These require FDA approval before initiation. If your project involves a new drug or device, consult with the DDI Research team and James Unick early in the planning process.
[Image: QI vs. Research decision flowchart]

16. Writing

Formatting & Reporting Numbers

  • Follow journal-specific author guidelines for formatting
  • Use AMA Manual of Style as default for medical manuscripts
  • Report numbers consistently: spell out numbers below 10, use numerals for 10 and above
  • Always include units for measurements and lab values
  • Use en-dashes for ranges (e.g., 95% CI 0.51–0.76), not hyphens

CCF Writing Resources

The CCF Library offers writing support: CCF Writing Guide

AI Editing Tools

Be aware: Journals have access to tools that can detect AI editing. Always keep a copy of your manuscript before using AI-editing tools. Be transparent about AI use per ICMJE guidelines (see Section 9).
  • Paperpal — AI editing tool with a generative AI writing feature (Co-pilot) which can be used for grants, not for publication
  • AJE Curie — Professional language editing service

17. Reference Managers

Reference managers are mandatory. All fellows must use a reference manager for every manuscript.
ToolNotes
EndNoteInstitutional standard. Free via CCF Library: CCF EndNote Guide
ZoteroFree, open-source alternative
MendeleyFree, owned by Elsevier

Do not manually type references — this introduces errors and wastes time. Use your reference manager to insert citations and auto-generate the bibliography.

18. Resources

ResourceLink / Description
CCF Library PortalPubMed & database access
CCF Writing GuideWriting resources & tutorials
CCF EndNote GuideSetup & training
OnBrandCCF poster templates, logo assets, brand guidelines (Intranet)
REDCapElectronic data capture — use for all study data (not Excel)
JToolData delivery from Jie Dai after IRB approval
Big Database GuideNCBI user guide to various big databases
ICMJE GuidelinesAuthorship & reporting standards
CONSORT StatementRCT reporting checklist
STROBE StatementObservational study reporting
Biostatistics ReferenceCORS Fellowship Biostatistics Guide
Claude Desktop GuideGuide to Claude Desktop for Research

19. Lessons Learned — Real Examples

Learn from past mistakes. The following are real examples of avoidable errors that have occurred in our department. These lessons are shared to prevent recurrence — not to assign blame.
Common pitfalls in study design & execution
  • Starting data collection before IRB approval — even "preparatory" chart review has limits; know the difference
  • Not using REDCap — Excel spreadsheets with PHI are an IRB and HIPAA violation waiting to happen
  • Not updating REDCap Tracking Tool — if the department doesn't know the study exists, it can't help when problems arise
  • Submitting abstracts without PI review — abstracts are published and represent the department
  • Late abstracts — submit at least 1 week before deadline for staff review
  • Not closing IRBs and REDCaps when leaving — creates compliance orphans
  • Padding CVs with minimal contributions — this is easily detected and hurts your credibility
  • Not keeping a copy before AI editing — journals can detect AI-edited text and may request the original
Common pitfalls in manuscript writing
  • Manually typing references — use a reference manager (see Section 17)
  • Inconsistent formatting — follow the target journal's author instructions exactly
  • Overcommitting — too many projects = late data, late abstracts, late manuscripts
  • Not knowing the CCF literature — if Cleveland Clinic has published on your topic, you must cite it and explain how your work adds to it
  • Submitting to the wrong journal — discuss target journal with your PI early